Reading PAGE
Peer Evaluation activity
| Trusted by | 1 |
| Views | 17 |
Total impact ?
Send a 
Bruce has...
| Trusted | 0 |
| Reviewed | 0 |
| Emailed | 0 |
| Shared/re-used | 0 |
| Discussed | 0 |
| Invited | 0 |
| Collected | 0 |
This was brought to you by:
Followblock this user Bruce Spencer Trusted member
Senior Research Associate
National Research Council
Clause trees: a tool for understanding and implementing resolution in automated reasoning
Oh la la
Your session has expired but don’t worry, your message
has been saved.Please log in and we’ll bring you back
to this page. You’ll just need to click “Send”.
Your evaluation is of great value to our authors and readers. Many thanks for your time.
Your mailing list is currently empty.
It will build up as you send messages
and links to your peers.
Enter the e-mail addresses of your recipients in the box below. Note: Peer Evaluation will NOT store these email addresses log in
Your message has been sent.
Description
Title : Clause trees: a tool for understanding and implementing resolution in automated reasoning
Area : Computer Science
Language : English
Url : http://www.cs.unb.ca/research-groups/argroup/pdf/TR95.pdf
Doi : 10.1.1.69.4375
Abstract : A new methodology/data structure, the clause tree, is developed for automated reasoning based on resolution in first order logic. A clause tree T on a set S of clauses is a 4-tuple , where N is a set of nodes, divided into clause nodes and atom nodes, E is a set of edges, each of which joins a clause node to an atom node, L is a labeling of N ? E which assigns to each clause node a clause of S, to each atom node an instance of an atom of some clause of S, and to each edge either + or ?. The edge joining a clause node to an atom node is labeled by the sign of the corresponding literal in the clause. A resolution is represented by unifying two atom nodes of different clause trees which represent complementary literals. The merge of two identical literals is represented by placing the path joining the two corresponding atom nodes into the set M of chosen merge paths. The tail of the merge path becomes a closed leaf, while the head remains an open leaf which can be resolved on. The clause cl(T) that T represents, is the set of literals corresponding to the labels of the open leaves modified by the signs of the
Subject : unspecifiedArea : Computer Science
Language : English
| Affiliations : |
Doi : 10.1.1.69.4375
Leave a comment
This contribution has not been reviewed yet. review?
You may receive the Trusted member label after :
• Reviewing 10 uploads, whatever the media type.
• Being trusted by 10 peers.
• If you are blocked by 10 peers the "Trust label" will be suspended from your page. We encourage you to contact the administrator to contest the suspension.
Please select an affiliation to sign your evaluation:
Please select an affiliation:
Bruce's Peer Evaluation activity
| Trusted by | 1 |
- FPeer Evaluation, Publisher, Peer Evaluation.
| Views | 17 |
- 3A Top Down Algorithm to Find Only Minimal Clause Trees
- 3Clause trees: a tool for understanding and implementing resolution in automated reasoning
- 3Determining Internet Users � Values for Private
- 2CADE-15 - The 15th International Conference on Automated Deduction - Workshop Proceedings - Using AI methods in Deduction
- 2Determining internet users� values for private information
- 1Avoiding Duplicate Proofs with the Foothold Refinement
- 1Efficient Algorithms to Detect and Restore Minimality, an Extension of the Regular Restriction of Resolution
- 1Extending the Regular Restriction of Resolution to Non-Linear Subdeductions
- 1Inference Queues for Communicating and Monitoring Declarative Information between Web Services
Bruce has...
| Trusted | 0 |
| Reviewed | 0 |
| Emailed | 0 |
| Shared/re-used | 0 |
| Discussed | 0 |
| Invited | 0 |
| Collected | 0 |
Full Text request
Your request will be sent.
Please enter your email address to be notified
when this article becomes available
Your email