New Full text for this article was not available? Send a request to the author(s).
Reading PAGE
Peer Evaluation activity
| Trusted by | 1 |
| Downloads | 614 |
| Views | 45 |
| Full text requests | 1 |
| Collected by | 1 |
Total impact ?
Send a 
Aliaksandr has...
| Trusted | 0 |
| Reviewed | 1 |
| Emailed | 0 |
| Shared/re-used | 0 |
| Discussed | 0 |
| Invited | 0 |
| Collected | 1 |
This was brought to you by:
Followblock this user Aliaksandr Birukou Trusted member
Post Doctorate
DISI, University of Trento, Trento
Liquid Publications Green Paper
Oh la la
Your session has expired but don’t worry, your message
has been saved.Please log in and we’ll bring you back
to this page. You’ll just need to click “Send”.
Your evaluation is of great value to our authors and readers. Many thanks for your time.
Review 
Short review
When you're done, click "publish"
Only blue fields are mandatory.
Your mailing list is currently empty.
It will build up as you send messages
and links to your peers.
No one besides you has access to this list.
Enter the e-mail addresses of your recipients in the box below. Note: Peer Evaluation will NOT store these email addresses log in
Your message has been sent.
Description
Title : Liquid Publications Green Paper
Author(s) : Judith Simon, Aliaksandr Birukou, Fabio Casati, Roberto Casati, Maurizio Marchese
Subject : unspecified
Area : Computer Science
Language : English
Year : 2011
Author(s) : Judith Simon, Aliaksandr Birukou, Fabio Casati, Roberto Casati, Maurizio Marchese
Abstract : In the FET-Open Project “LiquidPublications”, researchers from a variety of different backgrounds aimed at proposing a paradigm shift in the way scientific knowledge is created, disseminated, and evaluated, by studying scientific practices of publication and developing both theoretical models and web-based instruments to assist the production and dissemination processes. In the following we will outline the main results, leading to insights and lessons learned from our project. Our gained expertise allows us to formulate a number of concrete recommendations hopefully useful for improving processes in research and scholarly communication. These recommendations are directed at different stakeholders in research, such researchers themselves in their different functions as authors or reviewers, research funders (EU and national funders), libraries, learned societies (such as IEEE, ACM, ICST), Publishers, Universities, Evaluation Agencies as well as society at large.
Keywords : LiquidPubSubject : unspecified
Area : Computer Science
Language : English
Year : 2011
| Affiliations : | DISI, University of Trento, Trento |
Leave a comment
This contribution has not been reviewed yet. review?
You may receive the Trusted member label after :
• Reviewing 10 uploads, whatever the media type.
• Being trusted by 10 peers.
• If you are blocked by 10 peers the "Trust label" will be suspended from your page. We encourage you to contact the administrator to contest the suspension.
Please select an affiliation to sign your evaluation:
Please select an affiliation:
Aliaksandr's Peer Evaluation activity
| Trusted by | 1 |
- FPeer Evaluation, Publisher, Peer Evaluation.
| Downloads | 614 |
- 89LiquidPub D1.1. State of the art in modelling evolutionary, collaborative, and multi-faceted knowledge artefacts; analysis of reviews and modelling of reviewers' behaviour in peer review; computational trust, reputation models, and social network analysis
- 74Service for selecting patterns
- 61LiquidPub D2.1 - Processes, Roles and Licensing Models for SKO Lifecycle Management (v2)
- 58LiquidPub D3.3. Simulation and validation of the behavioral models
- 53LiquidPub D3.1. Analysis of Reviewing Systems (public version)
- 52LiquidPub D1.2. SKO structure, evolution, and navigation models (v3)
- 48LiquidPub D2.2 Extension to other disciplines
- 47LiquidPub. D2.3 - LiquidPub processes plugins (v2)
- 42Liquid Publications Green Paper
- 40LiquidPub D3.2. Model of reviewers’ behavior in peer reviews
- 39LiquidPub D1.3. LiquidPub Core Platform
- 11Alternatives to Peer Review: Novel Approaches for Research Evaluation
| Views | 45 |
- 13Service for selecting patterns
- 10Requirements, configuration management and traceability for safety critical software
- 4Liquid Publications Green Paper
- 3Liquid journals: scientific journals in the Web 2.0 era
- 3A Multi-Agent System that Facilitates Scientific Publications Search
- 3IC-service
- 2UCount : a Community-Driven Approach for Measuring Scientific Reputation
- 2Efficient rotation invariant object detection using boosted Random Ferns
- 2LiquidPub D3.1. Analysis of Reviewing Systems (public version)
- 1LiquidPub D1.2. SKO structure, evolution, and navigation models (v3)
- 1LiquidPub D1.3. LiquidPub Core Platform
- 1Alternatives to Peer Review: Novel Approaches for Research Evaluation
| Full text requests | 1 |
Title of the work: Alternatives to Peer Review: Novel Approaches for Research Evaluation
- Anonymous (1)
| Collected by | 1 |
- FAliaksandr Birukou, Post Doctorate, DISI, University of Trento, Trento.
Aliaksandr has...
| Trusted | 0 |
| Reviewed | 1 |
| Emailed | 0 |
| Shared/re-used | 0 |
| Discussed | 0 |
| Invited | 0 |
| Collected | 1 |
- Aliaksandr Birukou, Post Doctorate, DISI, University of Trento, Trento.
Full Text request
Your request will be sent.
Please enter your email address to be notified
when this article becomes available
Your email
© 2010-2012, by ColDev / Collective Developments - ColDev Editions is a member of 
the citation linking backbone.