Reading PAGE
Peer Evaluation activity
| Trusted by | 1 |
| Views | 6 |
Total impact ?
Send a 
Todd has...
| Trusted | 0 |
| Reviewed | 0 |
| Emailed | 0 |
| Shared/re-used | 0 |
| Discussed | 0 |
| Invited | 0 |
| Collected | 0 |
This was brought to you by:
Containment of Conjunctive Queries on Annotated Relations
Oh la la
Your session has expired but don’t worry, your message
has been saved.Please log in and we’ll bring you back
to this page. You’ll just need to click “Send”.
Your evaluation is of great value to our authors and readers. Many thanks for your time.
Your mailing list is currently empty.
It will build up as you send messages
and links to your peers.
Enter the e-mail addresses of your recipients in the box below. Note: Peer Evaluation will NOT store these email addresses log in
Your message has been sent.
Description
Title : Containment of Conjunctive Queries on Annotated Relations
Area : Computer Science
Language : English
Url : http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~tjgreen/papers/icdt2009_containment.pdf
Doi : 10.1.1.145.9313
Abstract : We study containment and equivalence of (unions of) conjunctive queries on relations annotated with elements of a commutative semiring. Such relations and the semantics of positive relational queries on them were introduced in a recent paper as a generalization of set semantics, bag semantics, incomplete databases, and databases annotated with various kinds of provenance information. We obtain positive decidability results and complexity characterizations for databases with lineage, why-provenance, and provenance polynomial annotations, for both conjunctive queries and unions of conjunctive queries. At least one of these results is surprising given that provenance polynomial annotations seem “more expressive ” than bag semantics and under the latter, containment of unions of conjunctive queries is known to be undecidable. The decision procedures rely on interesting variations on the notion of containment mappings. We also show that for any positive semiring (a very large class) and conjunctive queries without self-joins, equivalence is the same as isomorphism. 1.
Subject : unspecifiedArea : Computer Science
Language : English
| Affiliations : |
Doi : 10.1.1.145.9313
Leave a comment
This contribution has not been reviewed yet. review?
You may receive the Trusted member label after :
• Reviewing 10 uploads, whatever the media type.
• Being trusted by 10 peers.
• If you are blocked by 10 peers the "Trust label" will be suspended from your page. We encourage you to contact the administrator to contest the suspension.
Please select an affiliation to sign your evaluation:
Please select an affiliation:
Todd's Peer Evaluation activity
| Trusted by | 1 |
- FPeer Evaluation, Publisher, Peer Evaluation.
| Views | 6 |
- 2Containment of Conjunctive Queries on Annotated Relations
- 1Chapter 2 MODELS FOR INCOMPLETE AND PROBABILISTIC INFORMATION
- 1SPECIAL ISSUE PAPER Implementing mapping composition
- 1The ORCHESTRA collaborative data sharing system
- 1To ElisabethABSTRACT COLLABORATIVE DATA SHARING WITH MAPPINGS AND PROVENANCE
Todd has...
| Trusted | 0 |
| Reviewed | 0 |
| Emailed | 0 |
| Shared/re-used | 0 |
| Discussed | 0 |
| Invited | 0 |
| Collected | 0 |
Full Text request
Your request will be sent.
Please enter your email address to be notified
when this article becomes available
Your email