Privacy Policy  |  About Peer Evaluation  |  Terms
Reading PAGE

Peer Evaluation activity

Trusted by 1
Views 10
Collected by 1
Followed by 1
View details

Total impact ?

    Invite this peer to...

    Send a

    Send

    Mark has...

    Trusted 0
    Reviewed 0
    Emailed 0
    Shared/re-used 0
    Discussed 0
    Invited 0
    Collected 2
    View details

     

    This was brought to you by:

    block this user Mark Keane Trusted member

    Professor

    School of Computer Science & Informatics, University College Dublin

    ABSTRACT Evaluating Interfaces for Intelligent Mobile Search

    Export to Mendeley

    Recent developments in the mobile phone market have led to a significant increase in the number of users accessing the Mobile Internet. Handsets have been improved to support a diverse range of content types (text, graphics, audio, video etc.), infrastructure investments have delivered improved bandwidth, and changes to billing models offer users much greater value for content. Today large numbers of users are moving away from browsing operator portals and towards off-portal search, leading to a growing need for mobile specific search engine technologies. In this paper we argue that existing mobile search engines are unlikely to offer an adequate service for mobile searchers. Most borrow traditional query-based search and list-based result presentation formats from Web search and as such are not well optimised for the input and display features of mobile devices. For example, many simply attempt to translate Web content for the mobile space which is not appropriate. In this paper we evaluate an alternative strategy which replaces the usual result snippet with a more economic alternative that is composed of the keywords used in related queries. We argue that this alternative is better suited to the display characteristics of mobile devices, without compromising the informativeness of result snippets.

    Oh la laClose

    Your session has expired but don’t worry, your message
    has been saved.Please log in and we’ll bring you back
    to this page. You’ll just need to click “Send”.

    Your evaluation is of great value to our authors and readers. Many thanks for your time.

    Review Close

    Short review
    Select a comment
    Select a grade
    You and the author
    Anonymity My review is anonymous( Log in  or  Register )
    publish
    Full review
    Display full review
    Close

    When you're done, click "publish"

    Only blue fields are mandatory.

    Relation to the author*
    Overall Comment*
    Anonymity* My review is anonymous( Log in  or  Register )
     

    Focus & Objectives*

    Have the objectives and the central topic been clearly introduced?

    Novelty & Originality*

    Do you consider this work to be an interesting contribution to knowledge?

    Arrangement, Transition and Logic

    Are the different sections of this work well arranged and distributed?

    Methodology & Results

    Is the author's methodology relevant to both the objectives and the results?

    Data Settings & Figures

    Were tables and figures appropriate and well conceived?

    References and bibliography

    Is this work well documented and has the bibliography been properly established?

    Writing

    Is this work well written, checked and edited?

    Write Your Review (you can paste text as well)
    Please be civil and constructive. Thank you.


    Grade (optional, N/A by default)

    publish
    Cancel
    N/A 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 9 9.5 10
    Close

    Your mailing list is currently empty.
    It will build up as you send messages
    and links to your peers.

     No one besides you has access to this list.
    Close
    Enter the e-mail addresses of your recipients in the box below.  Note: Peer Evaluation will NOT store these email addresses   log in
    Your recipients

    Your message:

    Your email : Your email address will not be stored or shared with others.

    Your message has been sent.

    Description

    New Full text for this article was not available? Send a request to the author(s).
    Title : ABSTRACT Evaluating Interfaces for Intelligent Mobile Search
    Abstract : Recent developments in the mobile phone market have led to a significant increase in the number of users accessing the Mobile Internet. Handsets have been improved to support a diverse range of content types (text, graphics, audio, video etc.), infrastructure investments have delivered improved bandwidth, and changes to billing models offer users much greater value for content. Today large numbers of users are moving away from browsing operator portals and towards off-portal search, leading to a growing need for mobile specific search engine technologies. In this paper we argue that existing mobile search engines are unlikely to offer an adequate service for mobile searchers. Most borrow traditional query-based search and list-based result presentation formats from Web search and as such are not well optimised for the input and display features of mobile devices. For example, many simply attempt to translate Web content for the mobile space which is not appropriate. In this paper we evaluate an alternative strategy which replaces the usual result snippet with a more economic alternative that is composed of the keywords used in related queries. We argue that this alternative is better suited to the display characteristics of mobile devices, without compromising the informativeness of result snippets.
    Subject : unspecified
    Area : Computer Science
    Language : English
    Affiliations : 
    Url : http://www.w4a.info/2006/prog/10-church.pdf
    Doi : 10.1.1.105.9528

    Leave a comment

    This contribution has not been reviewed yet. review?

    You may receive the Trusted member label after :

    • Reviewing 10 uploads, whatever the media type.
    • Being trusted by 10 peers.
    • If you are blocked by 10 peers the "Trust label" will be suspended from your page. We encourage you to contact the administrator to contest the suspension.

    Does this seem fair to you? Please make your suggestions.

    Please select an affiliation to sign your evaluation:

    Cancel Evaluation Save

    Please select an affiliation:

    Cancel   Save

    Mark's Peer Evaluation activity

    Mark has...

    Trusted 0
    Reviewed 0
    Emailed 0
    Shared/re-used 0
    Discussed 0
    Invited 0
    Collected 2
    • Mark Keane, Professor, School of Computer Science & Informatics, University College Dublin.
    Invite this peer to...
    Title
    Start date (dd/mm/aaaa)
    Location
    URL
    Message
    send
    Close

    Full Text request

    Your request will be sent.

    Please enter your email address to be notified
    when this article becomes available

    Your email


     
    Your email address will not be shared or spammed.