Can de-growth be considered a policy option? A historical note on Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen and the Club of Rome
At a few months' interval, Georgescu-Roegen's The Entropy Law and the Economic Process (1971) and Club of
Rome's Limits to Growth (1972) were published. Both emphasized the dangers of economic growth, and both
drew negative reactions from mainstream economists. Relying on archival evidence, we show that
Georgescu-Roegen and the Club of Rome developed strategies of mutual support, which would present them
at first view as natural allies. Georgescu-Roegen actually became a member of the Club of Rome, while
Dennis Meadows acknowledged the influence of Georgescu-Roegen's ideas on the team of authors of Limits
to Growth. But in the late 70's, the gap widened between Georgescu-Roegen's adamant defense of de-growth,
and the Club of Rome's less firm view of “sustainable growth.” This paper explores the process leading to the
self-isolation of Georgescu-Roegen, by showing that beyond a shared acknowledgment that economic and
biologic systems were interdependent, technological optimism and ambitions for the global management of
growth were central to the Club of Rome, while Georgescu-Roegen's personal history led him to ignore those
practicalities and judge that de-growth was inescapable.
Oh la la
Your session has expired but don’t worry, your message
has been saved.Please log in and we’ll bring you back
to this page. You’ll just need to click “Send”.
Your evaluation is of great value to our authors and readers. Many thanks for your time.
Review 
When you're done, click "publish"
Only blue fields are mandatory.
Your mailing list is currently empty.
It will build up as you send messages
and links to your peers.
No one besides you has access to this list.
Enter the e-mail addresses of your recipients in the box below.
Note: Peer Evaluation will NOT store these email addresses log in
Your message has been sent.
Description
New Full text for this article was not available?
Send a request to the author(s).
Title : Can de-growth be considered a policy option? A historical note on Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen and the Club of Rome
Abstract : At a few months' interval, Georgescu-Roegen's The Entropy Law and the Economic Process (1971) and Club of
Rome's Limits to Growth (1972) were published. Both emphasized the dangers of economic growth, and both
drew negative reactions from mainstream economists. Relying on archival evidence, we show that
Georgescu-Roegen and the Club of Rome developed strategies of mutual support, which would present them
at first view as natural allies. Georgescu-Roegen actually became a member of the Club of Rome, while
Dennis Meadows acknowledged the influence of Georgescu-Roegen's ideas on the team of authors of Limits
to Growth. But in the late 70's, the gap widened between Georgescu-Roegen's adamant defense of de-growth,
and the Club of Rome's less firm view of “sustainable growth.” This paper explores the process leading to the
self-isolation of Georgescu-Roegen, by showing that beyond a shared acknowledgment that economic and
biologic systems were interdependent, technological optimism and ambitions for the global management of
growth were central to the Club of Rome, while Georgescu-Roegen's personal history led him to ignore those
practicalities and judge that de-growth was inescapable.
Keywords : Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen, History of ecological economics, De-growth, Club of Rome
Subject : History of economic thought
Area : Economics
Language : English
Year : 2010
| Affiliations : |
Rotterdam School of Management |
Journal : Ecological Economics
Volume : 69
Pages : 2271–2278
Url : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.020
Doi : 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.020
Leave a comment
This contribution has been reviewed by 2 peers.